Comments on: Just Cause 2 makes 3 http://www.realtimerendering.com/blog/just-cause-2-makes-3/ Tracking the latest developments in interactive rendering techniques Mon, 17 Jun 2013 03:17:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: UVL http://www.realtimerendering.com/blog/just-cause-2-makes-3/comment-page-1/#comment-361 UVL Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:30:27 +0000 http://www.realtimerendering.com/blog/?p=1147#comment-361 Hi, thanks for using UVL as a source of your post. The editor that filled most of the data pointed out that an "annoyingly small number of games actually state the shader model version they require". http://www.uvlist.net/forum/thread/32418 If you have any good source about shader modes in video games , we'll be happy to fill the missing entries. Hi, thanks for using UVL as a source of your post.
The editor that filled most of the data pointed out that an “annoyingly small number of games actually state the shader model version they require”.
http://www.uvlist.net/forum/thread/32418

If you have any good source about shader modes in video games , we’ll be happy to fill the missing entries.

]]> By: Eric http://www.realtimerendering.com/blog/just-cause-2-makes-3/comment-page-1/#comment-330 Eric Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:01:42 +0000 http://www.realtimerendering.com/blog/?p=1147#comment-330 Right, like I mentioned, ignore the 2010 and 2011 figures on the graphs. I think the concept is that only released games are counted, though the site itself, http://www.uvlist.net/, is pretty impressive for its scope (if not the reliability of its data). Right, like I mentioned, ignore the 2010 and 2011 figures on the graphs. I think the concept is that only released games are counted, though the site itself, http://www.uvlist.net/, is pretty impressive for its scope (if not the reliability of its data).

]]> By: Mauricio http://www.realtimerendering.com/blog/just-cause-2-makes-3/comment-page-1/#comment-329 Mauricio Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:46:35 +0000 http://www.realtimerendering.com/blog/?p=1147#comment-329 There is a chicken-and-egg problem here: if developers keep holding back, then consumers have less reason to upgrade, but if consumers haven't upgraded, then developers can't financially justify moving forward. Kudos to the JC2 team for making this call, and I hope they are successful. The third graph appears to be ridiculous, right? There are and will be plenty of SM 3.0 (read as D3D9) games in 2010. There is a chicken-and-egg problem here: if developers keep holding back, then consumers have less reason to upgrade, but if consumers haven’t upgraded, then developers can’t financially justify moving forward. Kudos to the JC2 team for making this call, and I hope they are successful.

The third graph appears to be ridiculous, right? There are and will be plenty of SM 3.0 (read as D3D9) games in 2010.

]]>